●Algorithms,datacomeunderdefinitionoftradesecrets●Clientinfonotcollatedorprocessednotrecognizedastradesecret●RequirementstorequestinjunctionspecifiedThedraftjudicialinterpretation(JI)ontradesecretsreleasedbyChina’sSupremePeople’sCourtlightenstheburdenofproofforplaintiffsintradesecretinfringementlawsuits,–InterpretationonSeveralIssuesConcerningtheApplicationofLawintheTrialofCivilCasesInfringingonTradeSecretInfringements(draftforcomment)–’samendedAnti-UnfairCompetitionLaw(AUCL),thedraftlightensrights-holder’slegaldutybyshiftingtheburdenofprooftotheallegedinfringer,,,enttrial,therights-holderneedstoprovide“preliminaryevidence”,theallegedinfringer,Article8ofthedraftJIstatesthattherights-holderneedonlysubmitpreliminaryevidencetoprovethereisa“highprobability”thattheclaimedtradesec,partneratAnjieLawFirm,agreedthedraftJIlowersrights-holder’sburdenofproof,yet,thereisnoquantitativemeasurementof“ahighprobabilitythattheclaimedtradesecrethasbeeninfringed”andthereforeitishardtoexecuteinpractice,(Article9)oftheamendedAUCLdefinestradesecretsasanytechnicalinformationoroperationalinformationwhichisnotknowntothepublic,hascommercialvalue,andforwh,dataandcomputerprogramsmayconstdprocessing,suchasname,address,contactinformation,tradinghabits,transactioncontent,andspecificneedsofcustomers,mayconstit,Article5(2)ofthedraftJIstatesthatifthepartiesclaimtheinformationofaspecificclientisatradesecretonlyonthebasisofthecontract,invoice,document,voucher,,,thecourtwillnotrecognizeclientinformationunlessitiscollatedorprocessedastradesecrets,,theclausedoesnotspecifywhatqualifiesas“collation”and“processing”,anditremainsunclearwhetherthecollationandprocessingneedtobe“complicatedandin-depth”,tradesecrets,,arights-holdermustclarifyspecificcontentoftheclaimedtradesecretsandprovideevidencetoprovetha“relativelylowburdenofproof”fortherights-holder,whichisconsistentwiththeamendedAUCL,,itdoesnotmakeacompulsoryrequirementandleavesittothediscretionofthecourt,heinformationrequestedbytherights-holderisnotatradesecretorthereisnoinfringementoftradesecrets,,Article22ofthedraftJIaimstostrikeabalanceandpreventtheover-protectionofarights-holder,Zousaid.迅雷快鸟 v4.6.5.4官方正式版最新下载 ChinesevideoplatformKuaishouhasfileda5millionyuan($705,000)lawsuitagainstDouyin,accusingitsrivalof“piggybacking”onthecompany’,whichhasbeenacceptedbyBeijing’sHaidianDistrictcourt,KuaishouclaimsDouyinusedKuaishou’snametolinktoitsownproductpageon360MobileAssistant,—knowninternationallyasTikTok—ofinfringingKuaishou’strademarktodisplayitsownproduct,pro,KuaishouisChina’,Kuaishouclaimedithadsurpassed300milliondailyactiveusersonitsChineseapp,,Douyin’sparentcompany,tolddomesticmediaonWednesdaythatithadfileditsownlawsuitagainstKuaishouinMarchoversimilarissue,andislookingintoitsrival’rchenginesandothersimilarplatforms,onalinformation,raisingconcernsaboutcontentqualityandimpairedfunctionality.“IthinkwhatDouyinhasdonecouldconstituteinfringementofKuaishoustrademarkrights,”,anintellectualpropertylawyeratBeijingMingtaiLawFirm,toldSixthTone.“IfDouyinlinksKuaishouasitskeypaidsearchterminitsadrankings,itbasicallyweakensKuaishou’sconnectiontoitsusers,justasKuaishouarguesinitslawsuit.”Usually,third-partyserviceprovidersdon’thavealegalobligationtoreviewkeywords,andit’salsoimpracticaltoanalyzeeverywordinthesearchenginealgorithm,comestodisplayingsearchresults.“Iftherightsownerdiscoversinfringementorunfaircompetition,theycannotifytheserviceproviderandaskthemtotakenecessarymeasures,suchasdeleting,blocking,disconnectinglinks,andmore,”,Kuaishou,and360MobileAssistantdidnotrespondtoSixthTone’,,short-v,aBeijing-basedconsultancy,averagescreentimeonshort-videoappsduringthisyear’sextendedLunarNewYearholidayincreasedby27minutescomparedwiththesameperiodlastyear,withDo’sovercrowdedvideo,DouyinsuedTencentfordefamationoveranarticlepublishedonthecompany’,TencentandByteDance,suedeachotheroverunfaircompetition.